Adam Ash

Your daily entertainment scout. Whatever is happening out there, you'll find the best writing about it in here.

Friday, August 12, 2005

Cindy Sheehan blogs

This is George Bush’s Accountability Moment by Cindy Sheehan (Huffington Post)

This is George Bush’s accountability moment. That’s why I’m here. The mainstream media aren’t holding him accountable. Neither is Congress. So I’m not leaving Crawford until he’s held accountable. It’s ironic, given the attacks leveled at me recently, how some in the media are so quick to scrutinize -- and distort -- the words and actions of a grieving mother but not the words and actions of the president of the United States.

But now it’s time for him to level with me and with the American people. I think that’s why there’s been such an outpouring of support. This is giving the 61 percent of Americans who feel that the war is wrong something to do -- something that allows their voices to be heard. It’s a way for them to stand up and show that they DO want our troops home, and that they know this war IS a mistake… a mistake they want to see corrected. It’s too late to bring back the people who are already dead, but there are tens of thousands of people still in harm’s way.

There is too much at stake to worry about our own egos. When my son was killed, I had to face the fact that I was somehow also responsible for what happened. Every American that allows this to continue has, to some extent, blood on their hands. Some of us have a little bit, and some of us are soaked in it.

People have asked what it is I want to say to President Bush. Well, my message is a simple one. He’s said that my son -- and the other children we’ve lost -- died for a noble cause. I want to find out what that noble cause is. And I want to ask him: “If it’s such a noble cause, have you asked your daughters to enlist? Have you encouraged them to go take the place of soldiers who are on their third tour of duty?? I also want him to stop using my son’s name to justify the war. The idea that we have to “complete the mission" in Iraq to honor Casey’s sacrifice is, to me, a sacrilege to my son’s name. Besides, does the president any longer even know what “the mission" really is over there?

Casey knew that the war was wrong from the beginning. But he felt it was his duty to go, that his buddies were going, and that he had no choice. The people who send our young, honorable, brave soldiers to die in this war, have no skin in the game. They don’t have any loved ones in harm’s way. As for people like O’Reilly and Hannity and Michelle Malkin and Rush Limbaugh and all the others who are attacking me and parroting the administration line that we must complete the mission there -- they don’t have one thing at stake. They don’t suffer through sleepless nights worrying about their loved ones

Before this all started, I used to think that one person couldn’t make a difference... but now I see that one person who has the backing and support of millions of people can make a huge difference. That’s why I’m going to be out here until one of three things happens: It’s August 31st and the president’s vacation ends and he leaves Crawford. They take me away in a squad car. Or he finally agrees to speak with me.

If he does, he’d better be prepared for me to hold his feet to the fire. If he starts talking about freedom and democracy -- or about how the war in Iraq is protecting America -- I’m not going to let him get away with it.

Like I said, this is George Bush’s accountability moment.

1 Comments:

At 8/25/2005 10:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Dear Cindy: please ask President Bush the following questions:
1-Why are we in Irak anyway? There were no WMD as alleged. The inspectors from the U.N. failed to detect any by conducting spot checks around the country, Sadam's palaces included. If Mr. Bush and his team knew otherwise, why did they not tell the inspectors where to check?
2-Why Mr. Bush replied to John Kerry in the candidates debate, in response to questions about the absence of WMD, by shrugging his soulders and saying that Sadam was going to make them and hand them over to the terrorists to be used against the U.S.? Did he know that Sadam had no links to Al Quaeda and he was wary of the terrorist to do that? Does Mr. Bush can predict the future by extrapolation? Is he conscious that war is a serious matter to be treated so gingerly?
3-Why did we conduct a war by proxy in Afganistan by leaning on the Northern militias to avoid casualties and by doing so we failed to capture Bin Laden?
Why on the contrary did we go to war in Iraq precipitously and compromised our troops and all our resources?
Why as a consequence of the above the taliban are resurging in Afganistan, Bin Laden is at large and we have not "accomplished the mission in Iraq?
5-If the only moral justification of preventive war is the peril of an imminent attack, as was the case in Israel in 1967, why did we make preventive war to Irak if there was no danger of an imminent attack, and by doing so caused immense suffering to a defenseless people and to ourselves? Does he realize that unjustifed war is aggression?
6-Why if Sadam Hussein althoug an enemy of ours and a brutal dictator managed to hold his country together did we have to oust him? Does he understand that he served to maintain stability in the Middle East because Irak was a wedge between Siria and Iran, both enemies of him, and therefore served our purposes?
6-Why do we have to impose domocracy founded on our model to an islamic country where this wester model is foreign?
7-Does he learn the lessons of history?
Does he know that in Viet Nam we failed to impose democracy to a people that hated us, that we failed to impose a puppet regime and train an army to defend themselves?
If so why are we repeating the same mistake in Irak?

 

Post a Comment

<< Home